Criminal Defense News

Being charged with passing a worthless check, especially under WOCK3015 – Worthless Check (Business Account), is a serious matter in Florida. These cases often involve allegations that a business wrote a check without sufficient funds in its account, leading to possible misdemeanor or felony charges under Florida Statute 832.05. While some cases are misunderstandings, prosecutors can be aggressive in pursuing charges because they view them as both theft-related and fraudulent.

In today’s digital world, people frequently turn to Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and other platforms to vent frustration, make jokes, or engage in heated debates. But how far is too far? Under Florida law, certain posts—especially those that involve threats of violence—can be prosecuted as true threats. Even if the author insists they were “just joking” or exaggerating, courts can and do interpret online comments as criminal threats.

In a nation founded on the principles of free expression and the right to petition the government, the interplay between individual liberties and the need for public order is a constant legal frontier. This delicate balance often comes into sharp focus during public meetings, where citizens exercise their right to voice concerns and engage with elected officials. A recent decision from Florida’s Second District Court of Appeal, Rodney Keith Jones v. State of Florida, shines a critical light on these fundamental rights, particularly concerning charges of disturbing a lawful assembly and resisting arrest.

In June 2025, the Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal reversed a county court ruling that had improperly evicted a domestic violence injunction holder from a shared residence. The core legal issue: Can a landlord evict someone when a circuit court has already granted that person exclusive possession of the home under a temporary domestic violence injunction?

Prosecutors aren’t just lawyers—they’re gatekeepers to the justice system with immense power over plea deals, sentencing, and trial strategy. When they’re angry, defendants pay the price. Whether you’re facing fraud, battery, theft, or drug charges, knowing what frustrates prosecutors helps you avoid the harshest consequences. Let’s explore the top three things that anger prosecutors and how we protect our clients from their wrath.

Cell phones are more than communication devices—they hold a detailed record of our lives. In Florida and across the United States, courts have recognized the sensitivity and depth of this information. At the Law Office of W.F. “Casey” Ebsary Jr., we stay at the forefront of privacy law developments, especially those concerning cell phone searches in criminal investigations.

What Is the Border Search Exception Under the Fourth Amendment?

The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. However, an important exception applies at the border: routine searches of people and property at U.S. borders (including international airports and seaports) do not require a warrant, probable cause, or even reasonable suspicion.

Florida’s Implied Consent law under Florida Statutes § 316.1932 requires drivers to submit to chemical or physical testing—such as breath, blood, or urine tests—when lawfully arrested for DUI. Refusal can result in a mandatory license suspension or even a criminal charge for repeat offenders. Officers issue a stern warning: refusal leads to a one-year suspension for a first offense, or 18 months and a misdemeanor for subsequent refusals.

In today’s digital age, law enforcement increasingly relies on location tracking data and Location Data Evidence from Google Sensorvault and Apple’s tracking technologies to build criminal cases. This powerful evidence can drastically affect the outcome of your case. Understanding how this data is collected, used, and challenged in court is essential for effective criminal defense in Florida.

In Florida criminal trials, cell phone mapping evidence is increasingly used to place defendants near the scene of a crime. Prosecutors rely on call detail records and tower data to create digital maps that suggest a person’s location based on cell site activity. But how accurate is this evidence, and can it be challenged? Recent…