<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[Gibson Guitar - Law Office of W.F. ''Casey'' Ebsary Jr]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.centrallaw.com/blog/categories/gibson-guitar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.centrallaw.com/blog/categories/gibson-guitar/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Law Office of W.F. ''Casey'' Ebsary Jr's Website]]></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2025 15:06:18 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        
        <language>en-us</language>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[911 Recorded Call Violates Florida Wiretap Statute]]></title>
                <link>https://www.centrallaw.com/blog/911-recorded-call-violates-florida-wiretap-statute/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.centrallaw.com/blog/911-recorded-call-violates-florida-wiretap-statute/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Office of W.F. ''Casey'' Ebsary Jr]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Criminal Defense]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Federal Court]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Gibson]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Gibson Guitar]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Gibson Search Warrant]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Search Warrant]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[The Lacey Act]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[16 U.S.C. § 3372(a)(2)(B)(iii)]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>911 Recording Violates Wiretap Statute Florida Criminal Defense Attorney&nbsp;notes that a call from a 911 &nbsp;dispatcher TO a crime scene violated the Florida Wiretap Statute “section 934.03(2)(g)2, which the court broadly construed to allow an&nbsp;emergency agency to intercept and record &nbsp;any &nbsp;wire communication in order to&nbsp;acquire necessary information to render aid and assistance.” Complete Opinion&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="200" height="66" src="/static/2023/12/image-15.gif" alt="Wiretap, 934.03(2)(g)2" class="wp-image-2571" title="Wiretap, 934.03(2)(g)2"/><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">911 Call, Wiretap, 934.03(2)(g)2</figcaption></figure></div>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-911-recording-violates-wiretap-statute"><strong>911 Recording Violates Wiretap Statute</strong></h2>



<p><strong>Florida Criminal Defense Attorney&nbsp;</strong>notes that a call from a 911 &nbsp;dispatcher TO a crime scene violated the Florida Wiretap Statute “section 934.03(2)(g)2, which the court broadly construed to allow an&nbsp;emergency agency to intercept and record &nbsp;any &nbsp;wire communication in order to&nbsp;acquire necessary information to render aid and assistance.” Complete Opinion Follows:</p>



<p><strong>911 Recording Violates Wiretap Statute</strong></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-case-excerpts">Case Excerpts:</h2>



<p>“On January 17, 2010, a dispatcher with the Escambia County Sheriff’s&nbsp;Office, received a 911 call from a woman reporting a disturbance occurring at her&nbsp;daughter’s house next door. &nbsp;The woman gave the dispatcher the telephone number&nbsp;for that residence, and the dispatcher called the number to see if anyone there&nbsp;needed police assistance. &nbsp;After the line was answered, the dispatcher heard&nbsp;screaming and yelling in the background. &nbsp;No one said anything on the line; the&nbsp;line was simply open, and the dispatcher could hear a male threaten to shoot&nbsp;everyone in the house and himself. &nbsp;This call was recorded.”</p>



<p>“Section 934.03 prohibits the intentional interception and disclosure of wire,&nbsp;oral, or electronic communications without the parties’ consent or court&nbsp;authorization. &nbsp;However, an employee of an agency operating an emergency 911&nbsp;system may lawfully intercept and record&nbsp;<strong>incoming&nbsp;</strong>wire communications on designated “911”&nbsp;telephone numbers and published nonemergency&nbsp;telephone numbers staffed by trained dispatchers at&nbsp;public safety answering points only. &nbsp;It is also lawful for&nbsp;such employee to intercept and record outgoing wire&nbsp;communications to the numbers from which such&nbsp;incoming wire communications were placed when&nbsp;necessary to obtain information required to provide the&nbsp;emergency services being requested.”</p>



<p>§ 934.03(2)(g)2, Fla. Stat. (2009) (emphasis added)</p>



<p>“[T]he trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress an&nbsp;audio recording made by a 911 dispatcher ….”</p>



<p><strong>911 Call in Your Case? Call (813) 222-2220</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>