<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[Electronically Stored Information - Law Office of W.F. ''Casey'' Ebsary Jr]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.centrallaw.com/blog/categories/electronically-stored-information/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.centrallaw.com/blog/categories/electronically-stored-information/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Law Office of W.F. ''Casey'' Ebsary Jr's Website]]></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2025 15:06:18 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        
        <language>en-us</language>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Destruction and Spoliation of Evidence | Sanctions]]></title>
                <link>https://www.centrallaw.com/blog/destruction-and-spoliation-of-evidence-sanctions/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.centrallaw.com/blog/destruction-and-spoliation-of-evidence-sanctions/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Office of W.F. ''Casey'' Ebsary Jr]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 18:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Electronically Stored Information]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[ESI]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Federal Court]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Spoliation of Evidence]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[State Court]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Destruction of Evidence]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>“The sanctions: Defendant to be imprisoned for up to two years, or until he paid the attorneys’ fees and costs estimated to be a “significant amount.” Spoliation of Evidence in Cybercrimes Florida Cybercrime &nbsp;Attorney&nbsp;has been researching sanctions for&nbsp;destruction of evidence, also known as&nbsp;Spoliation. The Sanctions: Defendant to Pay Attorneys’ Fees or Serve Two Years Imprisonment&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="has-text-align-right"><strong>“The sanctions: Defendant to be imprisoned for up to two years, or </strong><strong>until he paid the attorneys’ fees and costs estimated to be a “significant amount.”</strong></p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="80" height="320" src="/static/2023/12/image-6.png" alt="Exclamation Point" class="wp-image-2621" title="Spoliation of Evidence, ESI, destruction of evidence, Electronically Stored Information, " srcset="/static/2023/12/image-6.png 80w, /static/2023/12/image-6-75x300.png 75w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 80px) 100vw, 80px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Spoliation of Evidence</figcaption></figure></div>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-spoliation-of-evidence-in-cybercrimes">Spoliation of Evidence in Cybercrimes</h2>



<p><strong>Florida Cybercrime &nbsp;Attorney</strong>&nbsp;has been researching sanctions for&nbsp;<strong>destruction of evidence</strong>, also known as&nbsp;<strong>Spoliation</strong>. The Sanctions: Defendant to Pay Attorneys’ Fees or Serve Two Years Imprisonment for “Egregious”&nbsp;<strong>Discovery Misconduct</strong>.</p>



<p>The plaintiff sought sanctions arising out of the defendants’ intentional&nbsp;<strong>spoliation&nbsp;</strong>of evidence and other litigation misconduct in this intellectual property&nbsp;<strong>litigation</strong>. There were eight preservation issues including: use of wiping software; failure to implement<strong>&nbsp;litigation hold</strong>; failure to preserve an external hard drive; failure to preserve files and e-mails notwithstanding plaintiff’s demands and several court orders.</p>



<p>The Judge found through four years of discovery, the defendant had actual knowledge of his duty to preserve, “yet delayed and misrepresented the completeness of the&nbsp;<strong>ESI&nbsp;</strong>[<strong>Electronically Stored Information</strong>] production and deleted, destroyed and otherwise failed to preserve evidence.” The Judge then found the&nbsp;<strong>destruction</strong>&nbsp;“collectively constitute[d] the single most egregious example of&nbsp;<strong>spoliation&nbsp;</strong>[that he has] encountered in any case & in nearly fourteen years on the bench.”</p>



<p>The sanctions: Defendant to be imprisoned for up to two years, or until he paid the attorneys’ fees and costs estimated to be a “significant amount.”</p>



<p>Sources:</p>



<p>Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc., 2010 WL 3703696 (D. Md. Sept. 9, 2010)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>